<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Pattern:  Competing Meanings in Website Nomenclature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/anti-pattern-competing-meanings-in-website-nomenclature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/anti-pattern-competing-meanings-in-website-nomenclature/</link>
	<description>The art and science of interaction design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Toler</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/anti-pattern-competing-meanings-in-website-nomenclature/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Toler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=967#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tyler!   I really need to think about proof-reading these things if I&#039;m going to advocate obsessing over language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tyler!   I really need to think about proof-reading these things if I&#8217;m going to advocate obsessing over language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/anti-pattern-competing-meanings-in-website-nomenclature/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=967#comment-293</guid>
		<description>just noticed a hint of irony: &quot;3. An interface inherits the context of it’s medium, not just it’s subject matter.&quot; both &quot;it&#039;s&quot; should be &quot;its;&quot; the possessive, not the conjunction. :)

other than that, i *really* appreciate the distinction of &quot;fewest competing meanings.&quot; excellent work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just noticed a hint of irony: &#8220;3. An interface inherits the context of it’s medium, not just it’s subject matter.&#8221; both &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; should be &#8220;its;&#8221; the possessive, not the conjunction. :)</p>
<p>other than that, i *really* appreciate the distinction of &#8220;fewest competing meanings.&#8221; excellent work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
