Comments on: Learning Theories For Interaction Designers #2: Schema Theory http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/learning-theories-for-instructional-designers-2-schema-theory/ Interaction Design: chewed, swallowed, and digested. Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:33:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Constructing understanding « Hypocaffeinic http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/learning-theories-for-instructional-designers-2-schema-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-1772 Constructing understanding « Hypocaffeinic Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:33:37 +0000 http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1331#comment-1772 [...] Theory: The construction of scaffolds of understanding, as discussed above. Example of a schema surrounding ‘egg’. This to me most represents the evolution of the various theories on [...] [...] Theory: The construction of scaffolds of understanding, as discussed above. Example of a schema surrounding ‘egg’. This to me most represents the evolution of the various theories on [...]

]]> By: Rod Ward http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/learning-theories-for-instructional-designers-2-schema-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-829 Rod Ward Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:15:14 +0000 http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1331#comment-829 Very interesting article. It matches in nicely with a book I've been reading by Ruth Colvin Clarke about Building Expertise. I'm an instructional designer and elearning developer working mainly under contract building elearning courses for the corporate world. But I also have a pet project of my own to build an elearning course ABOUT elearning itself. If it's OK with you, I'd like to quote your article. It explains the concept well. Rod Ward Very interesting article. It matches in nicely with a book I’ve been reading by Ruth Colvin Clarke about Building Expertise.

I’m an instructional designer and elearning developer working mainly under contract building elearning courses for the corporate world. But I also have a pet project of my own to build an elearning course ABOUT elearning itself. If it’s OK with you, I’d like to quote your article. It explains the concept well.

Rod Ward

]]>