<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Design of Traffic Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/</link>
	<description>The art and science of interaction design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Toler</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Toler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1162#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a complementary post on world crosswalk design from Korean blog &#039;UX Recipe.&#039; Pardon the atrocious Google translation: http://bit.ly/bDEz4o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a complementary post on world crosswalk design from Korean blog &#8216;UX Recipe.&#8217; Pardon the atrocious Google translation: <a href="http://bit.ly/bDEz4o" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bDEz4o</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Toler</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Toler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1162#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Dave, some interesting differences in the German system.  Color seems to indicate intensity of danger (either red, more dangerous, or blue, less dangerous).  And much more icon-dependent despite more complexity in the rules themselves, such as varying speed limits by lane and priority turn order at intersections.   I think I&#039;d prefer more words myself, as I absorb them even when not in my native language, and tend not to concentrate on the subtle messages conveyed in some of this imagery (like the &quot;drive 80&quot; but only when roads are wet sign.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, some interesting differences in the German system.  Color seems to indicate intensity of danger (either red, more dangerous, or blue, less dangerous).  And much more icon-dependent despite more complexity in the rules themselves, such as varying speed limits by lane and priority turn order at intersections.   I think I&#8217;d prefer more words myself, as I absorb them even when not in my native language, and tend not to concentrate on the subtle messages conveyed in some of this imagery (like the &#8220;drive 80&#8243; but only when roads are wet sign.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: materialsdave</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>materialsdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1162#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a page on traffic signs in Germany:

http://www.gettingaroundgermany.info/zeichen.shtml

It&#039;s not in-depth and intended for traffic engineers like the MUTCD, but I think the comparison between designs is interesting.

I think the biggest difference between the two systems is the predominant use of icons in Germany versus text in the US. From a UX perspective, will a driver more quickly recognize what a word means (even if it is not in their first language) versus what a picture means?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a page on traffic signs in Germany:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gettingaroundgermany.info/zeichen.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.gettingaroundgermany.info/zeichen.shtml</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not in-depth and intended for traffic engineers like the MUTCD, but I think the comparison between designs is interesting.</p>
<p>I think the biggest difference between the two systems is the predominant use of icons in Germany versus text in the US. From a UX perspective, will a driver more quickly recognize what a word means (even if it is not in their first language) versus what a picture means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Shanks</title>
		<link>http://www.solidstateux.com/interaction-design/the-design-of-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Shanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidstateux.com/?p=1162#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Really interesting post and it&#039;s fascinating to learn that there is a hierarchy of shapes designed to communicate level of danger.  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d agree that the circle should be reserved for the most dangerous. I would think that the less common a shape, the more noticeable it would be, and circles are ubiquitous in nature. 

But really interesting post! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post and it&#8217;s fascinating to learn that there is a hierarchy of shapes designed to communicate level of danger.  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d agree that the circle should be reserved for the most dangerous. I would think that the less common a shape, the more noticeable it would be, and circles are ubiquitous in nature. </p>
<p>But really interesting post! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
